By Lindy Sipes
My best advice is this: find an advisor who is as passionate about your project as you are and who will help you get organized and make a plan from the very beginning. My advisor, Dr. Trini Stickle, helped me make an outline for the two semesters we spent working on my project and helped me set deadlines for drafts so I would stay on track. We made a plan to divide the paper into manageable chunks and drafted each chunk several times before piecing them together into a 75-page final version (don’t worry, most of it was archival material!). She spent hours helping me edit and assemble my work and scanning in notecards from the archives. She also lent me numerous books from her own library and connected me with prominent linguists to conduct interviews to round out the research. Without Dr. Stickle’s help and guidance, I would not have had a successful defense day.
1. The Outline
I chose to work on my CE/T project over a period of two semesters. Dr. Stickle and I made a rough outline of what those two semesters would look like.
Timeline:
Fall 2021:
- August-Thanksgiving: Reading, archiving, meeting with Dr. Stickle regularly
- September: set outline for paper: about 60 pages
Spring 2022:
- January-March: writing time
- April 1: Final work finished, send to readers
- April: Final formatting (goes to readers 2 weeks before defense)
- May 1st: Estimated defense date
This timeline made the project very manageable. At the beginning, I was thinking, “Holy cow, I have to write 60 pages by May!” The timeline helped me take it a few months at a time and see the bigger picture, and it let me know that I had plenty of time to get the project together. Need some additional help with the jumping-off point? Check out this short blog post on how to begin tackling a lengthy writing assignment.
2. The “Chunks”
My paper was divided into several chunks: the abstract, an introduction, critical reviews of the subject’s writings, a background with a brief history of the topic, a section for the interviews, a discussion portion, and appendices for the archival materials (notecards with neologisms). It made the most sense to write the sections in an order that was conducive to my research process, even though this was not the order they would appear in within the paper. For example, I began writing the critical reviews while I was reading and researching; the appendices were composed after meeting with Dr. Stickle to make scans of the notecards; I wrote the introduction last.
3. Drafting First and Editing Later
As soon as I finished a “chunk,” I would send it to Dr. Stickle and get her feedback. She emphasized that the important part was getting words on the page, even if I did not like the way it “sounded.” Then, we were free to edit it, and edit again, and edit again. No matter how terrible the first draft is, you can always keep editing. If your desire to write the perfect draft the first time keeps you from writing very much, you won’t have anything to work with.
4. Due Dates and Feedback
While the overall outline was vague, once we were in January-March (the “writing time”), I was meeting with Dr. Stickle every other week. We would talk about a section, and I would plan to get her a draft by the next meeting. Then we could talk it over, make edits at the meeting, make a deadline for the next draft, or begin planning the next section. This plan allowed some flexibility if I needed more time to work on a section, but still ensured that I was writing, because I knew I would have to show up to the next meeting with something to talk about. (If this “writing time” tends to take the wind out of your sails, take a look at this list of tips to keep your project on track and on time.)
No matter what topic you choose for your thesis project, it is inevitable that you will get burnt out and frustrated. Being organized, having a schedule, and meeting with your advisor regularly will keep you on track.